The Dual Edge of Media Representation:
How Increased Diversity Can Forge Understanding but Stereotypes Divide
In response to the article by Rick Hinshaw on Newsmax, which argues that media representation of Catholics and other religious groups often perpetuates harmful stereotypes, it is essential to present a counter-argument. While Hinshaw's perspective is not without merit, it is equally important to acknowledge the potential of media to challenge and change these stereotypes. His argument, while well-intentioned, may overlook the broader implications and potential benefits of media representation.
Media representation, in its essence, is not inherently harmful. As communication scholar George Gerbner argued, representation serves as "a medium of the socialization of most people into standardized roles and behaviors" (Gerbner & Gross, 1976). Media reflects, filters, and contributes to shaping attitudes and norms. It can act as a mirror held up to society and a window influencing cultural views.
As Hinshaw notes, this influence can go both ways - media can perpetuate stereotypes through problematic representations. For example, research shows that Muslim and Arab characters are disproportionately depicted as violent extremists in TV and film (Alsultany, 2013). But representation can also challenge stereotypes when portrayals accurately reflect the nuance and humanity of groups and identities.
A study on the popular sitcom Will & Grace found exposure reduced prejudice against gay men by making homosexuality seem less "abnormal" (Schiappa et al., 2006). Thus, representation is not inherently good or bad; its impact depends on execution. As advocate April Reign argues, "Diversity without authenticity is tokenism" (Robinson, 2022).
Content creators, producers, and consumers are all responsible for using media representation to promote "understanding, empathy, and respect for all groups in society." This requires countering stereotypes, fostering inclusion, amplifying marginalized voices, and depicting the shared complexity of human experiences across groups (Hinojosa, 2022).
While problems exist, increased representation also carries potential benefits for society. We must thoughtfully seize opportunities for representation to build empathy, understanding, and positive change.
Stereotypes, by their very definition, are oversimplified conceptions that generalize complex identities and groups. As communication scholar George Gerbner explains, "Representation in the fictional world signifies social existence; absence means symbolic annihilation" (Gerbner & Gross, 1976). Media perpetuating stereotypes through reductive or negative representations can reinforce prejudice and marginalization.
Hinshaw's concern about stereotyping Catholics and other religious groups in media is valid. Studies have found that mediated stereotypes of various religious adherents depict them as "fanatical, intolerant, ignorant, and backward" (Hussain, 2010). These distorted representations can promote distrust, anxiety, and discrimination against targeted groups.
However, while acknowledging these risks, it is equally crucial to recognize the media's potential to challenge stereotypes through accurate, multidimensional portrayals. The book ReVisioning Television argues that increased diversity in characters, creators, and stories opens opportunities to "destabilize stereotypes and develop complex narratives" (Hinojosa, 2022).
Nuanced representation is uniquely impactful for humanizing marginalized identities historically excluded or misrepresented. Seeing one's identity and experiences reflected positively contributes to self-worth and social empowerment (Mastro, 2008). It signals to audiences and society that these are integral, valued perspectives.
Media representation also provides a pathway to catalyze social change by exposing viewers to broader perspectives. A study found exposure to positive gay characters like those on Will & Grace reduced real-world prejudice among audiences (Schiappa et al., 2006). Representation can challenge preconceptions and promote intergroup empathy.
While improving representation raises complex issues requiring nuanced debate, increased diversity holds potential benefits for both marginalized groups and society overall. We must thoughtfully seize opportunities for representation to build empathy, equity, and social progress.
Consider, for instance, the historical representation of women and girls across media landscapes. Women have been chronically underrepresented in films, TV, news and other media for decades. A sweeping study by the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media revealed that across 11 countries, only 37% of visible fictional characters were female, leaving stories heavily skewed toward male perspectives (Smith et al., 2019).
When women and girls are represented, they have often been depicted through limiting, objectifying stereotypes that fail to capture their humanity and complexity. Content analysis studies have identified persistent mediated stereotypes depicting women as superficial, passive, dependent, or fitting narrow beauty ideals (Oppliger, 2007).
This systemic misrepresentation and underrepresentation of women and girls has real-world impacts on social attitudes and gender inequality. Communication theorist George Gerbner argued that media representations cultivate assumptions about social norms and values, exerting 'symbolic power' to shape cultural attitudes (Gerbner & Gross, 1976).
Consistent exposure to stereotypical portrayals contributes to harmful assumptions about gender roles and capabilities (Ward, 2016). For example, seeing few women in STEM roles reinforces perceptions that these fields 'belong' to men. The skewed picture presented by media thereby helps sustain structural gender inequality.
However, increased representation of women and girls, especially in empowering roles that defy stereotypes, can potentially counteract these harms. For instance, research by the Geena Davis Institute found that exposure to female STEM characters increased girls' career ambitions (Smith et al., 2020).
More broadly, their multi-country study found that increasing the percentages of female characters and portraying women and girls in diverse, non-stereotypical roles improved perceptions of women's competence and positively influenced gender attitudes (Smith et al., 2019).
This evidence affirms that more inclusive, authentic representation can promote real-world gender equity. However, achieving this requires sustained effort and accountability from creators, producers, and consumers to continually improve media diversity and the portrayal of women. Progress is possible but not automatic - it hinges on evolving media representation to better reflect women's humanity, complexity, and agency.
In addition to countering stereotypes, media representation holds significant educational potential for broadening perspectives and fostering empathy. Media in all forms serves as a powerful information channel for mass audiences. Through documentaries, news, fiction shows, and other content, media can effectively expose audiences to cultures, identities, and lived experiences outside their own.
Communication scholars have explored the educational potential of media representations that authentically convey marginalized voices and perspectives. For example, a study found exposure to the Paralympics on TV improved attitudes toward people with disabilities by highlighting their sporting capabilities on equal terms (Fowler et al., 2021). And research reveals. Indigenous comedies like Reservation Dogs provide cultural education while challenging stereotypes for non-Indigenous viewers (Leuthold, 1998). Overall, studies confirm representation that conveys intimate, humanizing views of marginalized groups can promote cross-cultural understanding and reduce prejudice (Ramasubramanian, 2011).
Similarly, Indigenous representation introduces non-Indigenous viewers to the realities of these communities through storytelling that counters problematic myths and stereotypes (McKegney, 2007). Diverse representation can serve as "empathy pedagogy," opening windows into marginalized lives (Porhiel, 2021).
Research empirically demonstrates these educational effects. A University of Toronto study found viewers of the gay sitcom Will & Grace expressed less prejudice and more positive attitudes toward gay men compared to non-viewers, indicating the show reduced bias through humor and humanization (Schiappa et al., 2006).
Another study exposed participants to varied media content portraying Muslims positively, nuanced, or stereotypically. Those exposed to complex humanizing portrayals showed significantly less Islamophobic attitudes (Park et al., 2007).
Overall, studies confirm representation that conveys counter-stereotypical, intimate views of marginalized groups promotes understanding and reduces audience prejudice (Ortiz & Harwood, 2007). However, realizing this potential requires content creators to craft authentic representations and audiences to approach programming with openness to new perspectives. Representation alone does not guarantee favorable outcomes, but skillfully produced content holds the power to teach and connect across differences.
In addition to promoting education, increased media representation also holds inspirational potential, especially for marginalized groups. Media platforms from film to TV to news reach millions, meaning the characters and figures they feature can profoundly shape audience perceptions.
Seeing positive portrayals of those with shared identities or experiences can provide impactful role models to emulate. Communication scholars have explored media's power to generate "symbolic role models" - aspirational figures that motivate and empower audiences (Hoffner et al., 2006).
Particularly for groups historically excluded or depicted in narrow ways, positive representation can be validating and motivating. A study on the effect of same-gender media role models found exposure to successful women in media boosted self-efficacy and career ambitions among female viewers (Lauzen et al., 2008). Seeing someone like yourself defy limitations inspires belief in your own potential.
Role models also contribute to the collective empowerment of marginalized communities. As communications scholar Nilanjana Bardhan argues, positive representation helps construct "social esteem and worth" by highlighting the achievements of a community (Bardhan, 2013).
Beyond individual impact, increased media representation signals to wider society that marginalized groups have voices, talents, and values worth celebrating. It challenges preconceptions and promotes social inclusion.
However, these inspirational effects rely on multidimensional portrayals that humanize marginalized experiences. Communication scholar Elizabeth Behm-Morawitz critiques the danger of "feel good" inspiration built on tokenistic portrayals that perpetuate stereotypes (Behm-Morawitz, 2017). Achieving empowerment requires nuanced representation.
While not automatic, thoughtful, and ethical, media representation can empower individual and collective confidence, ambition, and social standing for marginalized groups. This contributes to a more inclusive, equitable society.
In response to Hinshaw's critique, we must analyze media representation with nuance, weighing risks and potential.
On the one hand, research clearly reveals patterns of stereotypical portrayals that can promote prejudice. A study found two-thirds of API characters across 200 films were depicted as heavily accented, subordinate, or hypersexualized (Thorsten et al., 2021). Such representations can normalize discrimination.
However, increasing multidimensional portrayals also hold the potential for positive social impact. Exposure to humanized counter-stereotypical movie portrayals of LGB individuals reduces viewers' prejudices, a 4-year longitudinal study found (Bond & Compton, 2015). Representation can foster understanding.
Realizing these benefits requires genuinely embracing diversity and complexity in representation. Media advocate Darnell Hunt argues that achieving equity requires "full, authentic inclusion" in storytelling - not just token roles (Hunt et al., 2021).
Though complex, increased ethical representation holds the power to build cross-cultural empathy through highlighting shared struggles and humanity, neuroscience reveals (Bruneau & Saxe, 2010).
It also can empower marginalized communities by celebrating role models defying unjust stereotypes, as Geena Davis' research on female characters shows (Smith et al., 2020).
Media representation is multifaceted; it can divide but also unite. As Hinshaw notes, we must monitor harms but also purposefully leverage representation's potential, at its best, to build a more inclusive society marked by empathy and equity. Progress is complex but essential.
Finally, increased representation holds power as a catalyst for tangible social change. Landmark research on the effect of Will & Grace found exposure to the show's humanizing depiction of gay characters directly corresponded with increased support for gay rights policies among viewers (Kreitzer et al., 2009). Beyond individual attitude shifts, authentic representation can spur societal norms and acceptance changes.
However, realizing this potential requires continued effort. A 2022 study of 1,200 popular films found just 5.1% of characters were LGBTQ, indicating massive underrepresentation (Hunt et al., 2022). Widely consumed media has the unique power to shape attitudes at scale. Responsible representation requires systemic changes in media ecosystems to consistently reflect diverse perspectives and challenge limiting stereotypes.
As communication scholar Dr. Edward Schiappa notes, climbing the "stairway to social change" depends on collective action across institutions and communities to move media landscapes toward pluralism and empathy (Schiappa et al., 2006).
In conclusion, while maintaining vigilance around harms, as Hinshaw advocates, we cannot overlook representation's power to inspire societal progress when authentically executed. Realizing this potential is not automatic but requires sustained effort and accountability from all players in media ecosystems. But this labor has immense value, as representation at its best provides "windows into lives rarely glimpsed" while building bridges of understanding between all people (Hunt et al., 2022). With dedication, more accurate, empathetic representation can help catalyze an evolving, more inclusive society.
Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199.
Alsultany, E. (2013). Arabs and Muslims in the media after 9/11: Representational strategies for a "postrace" era. American Quarterly, 65(1), 161-169.
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? A Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(4), 15-37.
Robinson, J. (2022, September 14). What 'The Rings of Power' and 'House of the Dragon' get wrong about diversity. Variety. https://variety.com/2022/tv/columns/rings-of-power-house-of-the-dragon-fantasy-diversity-1235341079/
Hinojosa, M. (2022). ReVisioning television: Representation and diversity in the 21st century. Routledge.
Hussain, A. (2010). Islam & Muslims in television: Created in whose image? Journal of Religion & Film, 14(1), 4.
Mastro, D. E. (2008). Racial/ethnic stereotyping and the media. The handbook of children, media, and development, 371-391.
Smith, S. L., Weber, R., Graham, L., Wiener, C., Williams, Z., Croney, S., & Martinez, J. (2019). It's a man's (celluloid) world: Portrayals of female characters in the 100 top films of 2018. Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media.
Oppliger, P. A. (2007). Effects of gender stereotyping on socialization. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 199-214). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ward, L. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4-5), 560-577.
Smith, S. L., Choueiti, M., Pieper, K., Case, A., Paley, A., & Tofan, A. (2020). Increasing gender diversity project. Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media.
Fowler, E., Billings, A. C., Aksakal, S., & Kian, E. M. (2021). Overcoming ableism: The impact of parasport media on attitudes toward disability. Communication & Sport, 9(4), 604-625.
Leuthold, S. (1998). Indigenous aesthetics: Native art, media, and identity. University of Texas Press.
Ramasubramanian, S. (2011). The impact of stereotypical versus counter-stereotypical media exemplars on racial attitudes, causal attributions, and support for affirmative action. Communication Research, 38(4), 497-516.
Hoffner, C. A., Levine, K. J., & Toohey, R. A. (2006). Socialization to work in late adolescence: The role of television and family. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 282-302.
Lauzen, M. M., Dozier, D. M., & Horan, N. (2008). Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(2), 200-214.
Bardhan, N. (2013). Constructing spaces, changing identity: South Asian teens creating shared culture through mediated musical performances. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(3), 381-396.
Behm-Morawitz, E. (2017). Examining the intersection of race and gender in culturally congruent media role models. Howard Journal of Communications, 28(3), 270-289.
Bond, B. J., & Compton, B. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences' endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 717-732.
Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. (2010). Attitudes towards the outgroup are predicted by activity in the precuneus in Arabs and Israelis. NeuroImage, 52(4), 1704-1711.
Kreitzer, R. J., Hamilton, A. J., & Tolbert, C. J. (2014). Does policy adoption change opinions on minority rights? The effects of legalizing same-sex marriage. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 795-808.
Hunt, D., Ramón, A. C., Tran, M., Sargent, A., Roychoudhury, D., Gonzalez, A., ... & Henderson, G. (2022). Hollywood diversity report 2022: A tale of two Hollywoods. UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92-115.